AMG Funds


Effective October 1, 2016, the Aston Funds family has been integrated into the AMG Funds family of mutual funds. We are excited about the opportunity to serve you with more than 100 investment options spanning the asset class spectrum.

To learn more about the Aston Funds integration into AMG Funds, please visit Individual Investors can phone us at 800.548.4539. Investment professionals please call us at 800.368.4197.

Mutual Funds
Prospectuses & Reports
Shareholder Services


Skip to navigation

See More Stories

Oct 16 2012

3rd Quarter 2012 Commentary - ASTON/River Road Dividend All Cap Value II Fund

3rd Quarter 2012

Mixed Economic Backdrop

The global economy remained problematic during the quarter, with the economic backdrop mixed at best. With Europe mired in a recession and China clearly slowing, it was only a matter of time before the U.S. was swept into the fray. Although there were clear signs of improvement during the early part of the summer, by the latter half of the third quarter the tone of economic indicators turned less positive as durable goods orders declined, company surveys remained gloomy, payroll growth waned, and the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index turned negative. At the same time, housing was a clear bright spot, as lower interest rates and increasing affordability have finally helped the market form a bottom.

U.S. firms continued to struggle to overcome the challenging environment. In the last few weeks, a number of bellwether companies lowered their outlooks for 2012 on mounting economic concerns. Earnings growth among companies in the S&P 500 Index has moderated in recent quarters and, according to FactSet Research Systems, the estimated growth rate for third quarter earnings is negative 2.6%. If that estimate is correct, this will be the first year-over-year decline in aggregate earnings since 2009.

The market rally that started in June continued through the end of the third quarter as investors properly anticipated that the weakening economic picture meant further monetary support from the European Central Bank (ECB) and Federal Reserve. At first glance, the rally resembled the quantitative easing (QE)-induced surges of the past few years, but it would be an error to dismiss it as just another “risk-on” rally. Among S&P 500 stocks, the performance of many macro factors during the period was generally consistent with the strong rallies of the last three years, but the differentials were muted. The highest yielding companies in the S&P 500 lagged the lowest yielding companies by only half as much as they did following the launch of QE2 in fourth quarter of 2010. According to Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, low-beta and high-quality stocks trailed as well, but again the gap was not as large as had been seen previously. 

Unlike the other QE-induced rallies since 2009, investors generally favored large-cap stocks over mid- and small-caps. Value modestly outperformed growth across all market-caps, though the gap was narrower among large-caps than small-caps. While all 10 economic sectors in the Fund’s Russell 3000 Value Index benchmark posted a positive total return for the quarter, performance was mixed as the list of best and worst performing sectors each included both cyclical and defensive sectors. The best performing sectors were Telecommunications, Consumer Discretionary, and Energy, while Utilities and Technology posted meager results. Due to weakness in the transportation-related industries, Industrials was the third worst performing sector in the benchmark.

Hard Hit Industrials

The Fund underperformed its benchmark during the quarter as eight of 10 sectors had a negative total effect on relative performance. Although both sector allocation and stock selection, primarily in Financials and Telecommunications, detracted from returns it was weak stock selection within Industrials that hurt returns the most. Railroad operator Norfolk Southern and United Parcel Service were among the worst performing holdings as slowing economic growth weighed on many firms in the transportation industry.

Norfolk Southern reported results in July that were in-line with our expectations as strong efficiency gains and growth in merchandise traffic offset softness in its domestic coal business. As the quarter progressed, however, Chinese demand for U.S. coal exports faltered, reducing prices and the number of carloads traveling to eastern ports. Facing uncertain demand and lower fuel surcharge revenues, the company then forecasted that third quarter revenues would be down versus last year and issued guidance well below our expectations. Despite the headlines, we remain optimistic that growing intermodal traffic and a diverse book of business outside of coal will help offset the lost carloads and we maintained the portfolio’s position.

UPS kicked off a dismal earnings season for transportation companies when it announced weaker than expected results and lowered the firm’s full year guidance as international package revenue declined versus last year. Following last year’s reduction in Asian air capacity, the firm implemented another 10% capacity cut to better align costs with current demand. Domestic results were more encouraging with revenue up on strong business-to-consumer volumes, but management offered a dour outlook on the U.S. economy. 

Despite the woes among transportation stocks, the biggest negative individual performer was Intel. Shares were weak following a disappointing earnings release and a larger than anticipated cut in guidance. Although the company’s Data Center and Software & Services groups continued to post strong growth, its core PC business was softer than expected. Shares continued to slide after both Dell and Hewlett-Packard, Intel’s largest customers, offered disappointing results and guidance as well. Results in the industry tend to be cyclical, and we believe Intel’s large technology lead, strong balance sheet, and growing dividend continue to make it an attractive investment.

Finally, Nordic American Tankers traded lower on renewed weakness in tanker day-rates and the announcement that partner Frontline would leave their Orion Pool joint venture. Consistent with our sell discipline, we exited the small position due to accumulated unrealized losses.

Positive Allocations

Strong stock selection and an underweight position in the Utilities sector was the biggest positive driver of relative returns during the quarter, with overweight stakes in Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples also contributing positively to results. The top-performing holding in the portfolio was drug store chain Walgreen Company. Walgreen and pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts had a public contract dispute that locked the company out of Express’ network at the end of 2011. As the contract dispute escalated, sales comparisons turned negative and Walgreen’s shares performed poorly. Capitalizing on the market’s negativity, we increased the position throughout the year as we believed Walgreen retained the option to compromise and bring these customers back. The market misjudged this option and the stock rose double-digits following the announced settlement in July. We reinforced our conviction following the announcement by increasing the Fund’s position.

Two Energy companies—BreitBurn Energy Partners and Chevron—were among the top-five individual performers. Independent oil and gas master limited partnership (MLP) BreitBurn benefited from rising oil prices despite concerns about the partnership’s leverage after several acquisitions. A ninth consecutive quarterly dividend increase and a strong yield continues to support the stock as well. Chevron beat Wall Street expectations despite a year-over-year decline in upstream production. Good execution by the company, coupled with a boost in commodity prices in the weeks before the announcement of QE3, drove its stock price higher.

Portfolio Positioning

The Fund held 62 positions as of quarter end, towards the middle of our expected range of 50 to 75 holdings. We initiated no new positions in the portfolio, though we sold seven stocks. As markets advanced and valuations remained elevated, we sought to eliminate lower conviction or overvalued positions, consolidating the portfolio around higher conviction ideas.

Although we initiated no new positions during the quarter, a holding in retailer Kohl’s established shortly before the end of June experienced the largest strategic increase in the portfolio during the period. Kohl’s remains focused on maintaining a low cost structure through its off-mall strategy, allowing its stores to offer quality brand name products to consumers at moderate prices. As store growth has slowed, Kohl’s has added a robust dividend policy to a capital allocation plan that has seen it repurchase a significant amount of its own stock since 2006. At an investor conference in June, management indicated its intention to allocate $1 billion in free cash flow annually towards share repurchases and double-digit dividend growth. Although the company operates in an intensely competitive environment, with one-third of sales coming from fashion risk susceptible women’s apparel, we believe the market overly punished the stock on news of negative same-store sales growth earlier in the year. At the time of purchase, the stock was trading at a 37% discount to our calculated Absolute Value.


Looking at valuations at the end of the quarter, our discount-to-value indicator for the top-20 holdings in the Fund was 88%. Despite a modest decline from the previous quarter, valuations remain an important concern. At the end of June, nearly 17% of the portfolio was trading above 100% of our assessed Absolute Value (AV), versus 12.7% at the end of 2011. After reducing or eliminating nine positions trading above 100% of our AV, the percentage of the portfolio trading at a premium had still increased to more than 20%.

In recent months, we have been asked about the valuation of dividend stocks in general and whether we are concerned. When analyzing the universe of dividend payers we noted that valuations increased sharply as company payout ratios increased above 70%. Investors are often paying a hefty premium for these highest yielding stocks. We believe a total return approach is key to the success of a dividend-focused strategy, which is why this group represents a much smaller portion of the portfolio than it has in the past. We believe stretching for yield, without considering value, is a formula for capital losses.

Since June, the market has largely responded to the whims of central bankers, with little notice to the slowing pace of earnings growth and increasing unease voiced by management teams. As we noted previously, year-over-year earnings growth estimates turned negative for the third quarter and businesses across America are facing the same election and tax uncertainties as investors.  Given the Federal Reserve’s diminishing ability to supply a steady drip of supportive headlines to the market, investors and business leaders will likely key off the dysfunctional process in Congress amid what could be a challenging earnings season.

Although tail risk has increased, we continue to expect the U.S. market will deliver an attractive return for 2012. We would not be surprised, however, if September 14 marked the high point for the year. Much of the risk lies at the edge of the fiscal cliff. The market could prove quite volatile around the end of the year as the political process deals with this difficult issue. We wish we could provide a confident assessment of how that will play out, but the upcoming election muddies the water too much.

We would welcome a period of increased volatility or a choppy earnings season during the fourth quarter. Our watch list is full of stocks we would like to buy, but only at the right price. We believe that a patient, value-oriented process is central to long-term success. From a portfolio perspective, we remain focused on companies with growing dividends, healthy balance sheets, attractive valuations, and other characteristics we believe the market will reward in the months ahead, including the ability to thrive in a low growth environment.

River Road Asset Management

16 October 2012

As of September 30, 2012, Norfolk Southern comprised 2.17% of the portfolio's assets, United Parcel Service – 2.08%, Intel – 2.53%, Dell – 0.00%, Hewlett-Packard – 0.00%, BreitBurn Energy Partners LP – 1.02%, Chevron – 2.33%, Walgreen Company – 2.01%, Express Scripts – 0.0%, and Kohl’s – 1.77%.

Note: Funds that invest in small- and mid-cap stocks are considered riskier than large-cap stocks due to greater potential volatility and less liquidity. The Fund seeks to invest in income-producing equity securities and there is no guarantee that the underlying companies will continue to pay or grow dividends.

Before investing, consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Contact 800 992-8151 for a prospectus or summary prospectus containing this and other information. Please, read it carefully. Aston Funds are distributed by Foreside Funds Distributors LLC.


Aston History (212 KB, PDF)
Capabilities Brochure (2 MB, PDF)
Aston Style Box (46 KB, PDF)
Aston Subadvisers (490 KB, PDF)

Designed and created by DDM Marketing & Communications.